Scholars Test Web Alternative to Peer ReviewPosted in Articles, New Media on 2010-08-24 05:27Z by Steven |
Scholars Test Web Alternative to Peer Review
The New York Times
2010-08-23
Patricia Cohen
For professors, publishing in elite journals is an unavoidable part of university life. The grueling process of subjecting work to the up-or-down judgment of credentialed scholarly peers has been a cornerstone of academic culture since at least the mid-20th century.
Now some humanities scholars have begun to challenge the monopoly that peer review has on admission to career-making journals and, as a consequence, to the charmed circle of tenured academe. They argue that in an era of digital media there is a better way to assess the quality of work. Instead of relying on a few experts selected by leading publications, they advocate using the Internet to expose scholarly thinking to the swift collective judgment of a much broader interested audience…
Read the entire article here.